Recent research reveals that CO2 needs to be stored for at least 1000 years to make an impact reducing global temperatures.

While many technologies can reduce power sector emissions, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has gained support in Congress – but it’s the most expensive option available. Our analysis shows ...

The volcanic layers in the Northwest could hold megatons of planet-warming emissions but the infrastructure needed for that ...

Carbon dioxide, or CO2, is a major part of Earth’s thermostat — it’s our planet’s blanket that keeps us warm. And just like ...

To be built this spring in a patch of grass next to LSU's Petroleum Engineering Research, Training and Testing Lab, officials ...

Santos and Beach Energy’s Moomba project hopes to overturn the technology’s weak reputation. Its detractors say it has ...

Biggest pro: Can remove carbon for long-term storage, while producing carbon-emission-free energy. Biggest con: Facilities ...

Companies planning for carbon capture are signing deals with residents in rural Louisiana. Some are uneasy with what's ...

Carbon capture and storage — aka CCS, or sometimes CCUS — is a dangerous delay tactic championed by the fossil fuel industry and other polluters, like the biomass industry. It takes resources away ...

Layers of volcanic rock in Eastern Oregon, the Willamette Valley and the Columbia Basin have created fertile soil for farming ...

The government has pledged nearly £22bn for projects to capture and store carbon emissions from energy, industry and hydrogen ...

Swiss carbon removal specialist Neustark’s first carbon capture project in the UK has commenced operations, marking a step ...