Supreme Court Questions

Trump's Supreme Court appearance backfires

Supreme Court majority seems inclined to rule against Trump on birthright citizenship

A majority of Supreme Court justices peppered Solicitor General D. John Sauer with skeptical questions about the Trump administration's position that birthright citizenship should not apply to babies ...

· 6h

Trump Lawyer Struggles with Supreme Court's Question About Whether Native Americans Are Birthright Citizens: 'Uh, I Think So?'

FOX 26 Houston · 12h

Supreme Court justices raise questions in Trump birthright citizenship case

· 1d

Tracking Trump: Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case; Trump to address nation on Iran; Trump’s ballot order; and more

The Supreme Court seemed skeptical of Trump’s citizenship order.

· 1d

Trump v Supreme Court: The battle over birthright citizenship

· 1d

Trump attends Supreme Court arguments in birthright citizenship case

· 1d

Supreme Court justices appear sceptical over Trump's changes to US birthright citizenship rules

The Trump administration's case for ending birthright citizenship appears to be on thin ice after oral arguments concluded today at the Supreme Court

· 1d

Supreme Court Updates: Key Justices Appear Skeptical of Limiting Birthright Citizenship

· 1d

Trump Attends Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Then Leaves an Hour In

1don MSN

Supreme Court skeptical of Trump birthright citizenship order, Roberts questions argument in landmark case

The Supreme Court heard arguments on Trump’s executive order that would end birthright citizenship, a case that could reshape immigration policy and constitutional law.

8don MSN

Samuel Alito questions fellow Supreme Court justices

A case on turning away asylum seekers hinges on how a single phrase written by Congress decades ago is interpreted.

SCOTUSblog

Who is driving the conversation at the Supreme Court?

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making and