Peer review ensures quality in academic research by having experts evaluate and validate study results before publication, crucial for maintaining scholarly integrity.

Half of Science Reviewers Use Artificial Intelligence. Three-Quarters Of Researchers Don’t Know When Publishers Do In A Nutshell AI has quietly transformed peer review: 53% of peer reviewers now use ...

A new whitepaper from Frontiers shows that AI has rapidly become part of everyday peer review, with 53% of reviewers now ...

A survey of 1,600 academics found that more than 50% have used artificial intelligence tools while peer reviewing manuscripts ...

Peer reviews cost firms time and effort, and some accountants believe the process is focused on finding mistakes, but the purpose of peer reviews is to enhance engagement quality. Peer reviews can ...

We are having difficulty finding a second reviewer for your manuscript.” This is a response we have received more than once ...

Traditionally, scientific publishing happened behind the scenes, with only the final product of a new scientific article shared with the research community at the end of the process. The efforts of ...

Some requests by reviewers to cite their own publications are coercive and can unnecessarily delay indexation and publication.

Editor’s Note: Previously, this series on scholarly publishing has offered advice on approaching an editor, getting a book contract, and writing a “timely” book. Peer review can be stressful, even for ...

This essay was adapted from Adam Mastroianni’s newsletter, Experimental History. Subscribe here. In November, I published a scientific paper by uploading a PDF to the internet, and people were like, ...

Have you considered how the peer review process will work under the new quality management standards that firms providing audit and accounting services should implement by Dec. 15, 2025? The AICPA ...

Agency staff members say that the changes are reasonable, but they are worried about the potential effects on review.